Many students have done well. Some have confused past MLA formats with the current, which is understandable. Finally there are those who by all appearances of their work don't give a damn. You should because a poorly maintained, work-cited paper could cost you at least one letter grade, a waste. Citing works is an act of generosity that could save a reader hours of research and that takes only a minute of clerical time for the writer. In other words, if you don't give a damn about the works you have cited, you don't give a damn about the reader. If you don't give a damn about the reader, you probably won't write nearly well enough for the reader to care about what you think.
Format for Words Cited Page for the NYTimes article in the "Where's Waldo..." Posting:
Brustein, Joshua. "Tag-Along Marketing." NYTimes. 7 Nov. 2010. Web. 10 Nov. 2010.Let's presume the NYTimes did not give the article a byline. Here's how the Works Cited listing would appear:
"Tag-Along Marketing." NYTimes. 7 Nov. 2010. Web. 10 Nov. 2010.Can you vary the punctuation at your pleasure? Sure. Can you capitalize words as you see fit? Why not? There would be a problem, though: You would be wrong. Your grade would suffer.
Should I quote Brustein, how would the in-text citation appear?
"Everything is in place for location-based social networking to be the next big thing" (Brustein).What would happen if the article did not have a byline? Keywords from the article's title.
"Everything is in place for location-based social networking to be the next big thing" (Tag-Along).